I’ve been back home
from Florida for long enough now to give two of my purchases a good
going over, so let’s get right down to it: how good are the Woodford Reserve
Double Oaked and the Jim Beam Black 8 year old?
Ok, no messing
about: I can confirm the WRDO (which is not a regional american radio station…)
is superb. So much flavour is packed
in there. Absolutely the best bourbon I have sampled up to this point.
If you peruse
various opinion about the WRDO on the internet, it seems to swing wildly
between love it and think it’s all right. Then there’s the issue of price. It seems
Americans think $50 is a lot for 750ml of liquor. They should think themselves
lucky because, to put that in context, that’s less than £30. It’s not often you
can get a single malt scotch for
under £30 here in the UK, never mind one as playfully tantalising as this
bourbon is. So it stands to reason: I still think the WRDO is reasonably
priced, in fact… I think it’s a bargain because it is superb.
I can’t really do a
direct comparison with the standard bottling but, while I remember enjoying
that one, I felt it was too woody –
almost like gnawing on your parents’ furniture, not in a bad way just, in a way
that keeps it from being great. This Double
Oaked however, does have a bit of woodiness coming through, but it seems
very much toned down – which seems counterintuitive since the product is just
standard Woodford Reserve that has been aged for several extra months in new
oak barrels that have been toasted (for longer than usual) and then charred
(for as brief a time as possible – it would be interesting to know how briefly
it is possible to char something for).
For some reason this has resulted in all the great flavours that I
suspect are in the original Woodford Reserve but sadly subdued, coming to the
fore and literally pogoing around your palate. You get a surprising jolt of
pleasure in your first taste, every time you pour a glass. It’s tingly like
sweets but also woody with a bit of tobacco.
You also get an
extra 2 ABVs on the standard bottling with the Double Oaked (so, 45.2% is the
overall standard), so it’s a case of slightly more all round.
So let’s move on and
have a think about the Jim Beam. I wouldn’t advise trying the WRDO and Jim Beam
Black 8 side by side all that often because the outcome is that the Jim Beam
pales in comparison. That is not telling the whole story though - in fact,
you’d be doing the Jim Beam a disservice as it still achieves quite a high
standard – just not quite as high.
Like the WRDO, in comparison to its younger, standard bottling brother, it
packs in a good heft more flavour, a damn sight better texture, and removes
many of the more unrefined characteristics.
The Jim Beam Black 8
(43% ABV) really comes into its own in terms of value – at $25 for a litre (in
Duty Free) it would be rude not to give it a go. Since I bought both these
products at the same time, I have the best of both worlds – the WRDO for
occasions when I’m confident my tasting faculties haven’t been diminished by
spicy food (and I fancy something special), and a litre of surprisingly
enjoyable but great value Jim Beam for when I don’t want to think too hard
about what I’m drinking, and I don’t want to worry about whether what I’m
drinking is going to waste.
So in summation, you
can’t go wrong in considering either of these. You want a lot of something
cheap but full-flavoured? Allow me to introduce the 8 year old Jim Beam Black.
You want something more expensive but correspondingly special? WRDO.
Two impressive
bottles out of the three I’ve bought is a good return so far. Join me next week
when I’ll be breaking the seal on a Four Roses Single Barrel.
No comments:
Post a Comment