If you read my
recent Canadian Adventure posts, you will already be familiar
with the story of how I came into possession of another bottle of the Highland
Park 12, a personal favourite and one that I have bought numerous times
previously as presents for friends. On this occasion, it is as a failed gift attempt that I am able to
revisit and see if another couple of years’ drinking experience has affected my
opinion. It turns out my father-in-law doesn’t like peated whiskies at all –
even this one which, being familiar with Islay’s heavily peated fare, I
consider to be mild.
Highland Park is
still one of the coolest bottles around, with it’s chunky shape and oversized
cork – not classy in a traditional sense exactly, just invitingly robust (just
how I like my women…), treading that fine line between modern and classy with
consummate ease.
I can’t help noticing
the peaty aroma that escapes from the bottle on opening every time, but in the
glass, the smoky nose is more subdued, and you forget there’s any peat in there
at all. On first tasting, I’m thinking it’s not exactly a fine spirit, but it is so
damn tasty. The body is a little light, but the profile is all class.
On first taste this
time around, I was actually worried for a moment that Jim Murray was right in
his 2013 Whisky Bible about the HP12 losing some of its quality, but I
remembered I hadn’t appreciated my first bottle to its full extent immediately,
and resolved to reserve final judgement
until a full appraisal could take place.
He doesn’t
specifically say what’s wrong with this bottling, but puts it down to the cask
and hopes it’s an anomaly. Consequently he scores it a mere 78. I have to say, I
do believe I may have detected the slightest hint of a bum note in there, that
it would seem was a logical effect of a cask issue, but even this note appeared
only fleetingly and was quickly eclipsed by the mouthwatering flavours that are
evident elsewhere within the spirit. So even with what I am going to accept as
a possible slight flaw, HP12 is still significantly
tastier than many a malt - especially at this price point.
I thought for a
while that I might be loath to buy this as a gift until I could be certain the
high standard was restored (or unless I needed to buy a gift, but couldn’t
afford anything else at that particular time…), but as a dram for evening
enjoyment, it clearly still has a lot to give.
By the end of my
second tasting, I was convinced I’d been right all along, but to confuse matters
further, other tastings proceeded to prove disconcerting; it isn’t quite right, is it? I thought, Or is it?
One night after band
practice (and a beer), I settled in for another glass, and the flavours were delightful as they were dallying around
on my tongue. I picked up a bit of bacon on the nose, along with the usual
vanilla tones, and the spirit itself was soft, sweet and light. Probably the
most I’d enjoyed a dram in many a week.
What is going on with this bottle?
I wondered maybe if
this was a whisky to drink late at night (it was almost 11 when I poured it)
but then, I usually drink it later
on, having prepared myself with a blend first. Maybe that’s what I’m doing
wrong, maybe it follows pilsner best…
Reviews on forpeatsake.com
have alluded to the way the whisky can taste different from one day to the
next. This is something I’ve noticed before but, perhaps this time, that effect
is more pronounced than previously noted. Many of those reviews mention that
this bottle has become a trusty backup, one to keep in the cabinet at all
times, and I think that tendency to
transform further supports that practice.
So far I’ve found my
second bottle of this more puzzling than the first though, by turns, no less
satisfying or intriguing. It seems to me now, that if I don’t get another
bottle in and on the go soon after this one, the whole quandary could begin
over again – so why not keep it on standby and enjoy the rollercoaster
consistently, repeatedly, in perpetuity…?
It is that good. And
because of that, I am elevating this malt from where it stood at number 6 in my
all time single malt rankings to number 2, behind only Caol Ila 12 and ahead of
such luminaries as Ardbeg 10, Bladnoch 10 and Caol Ila Distiller’s Edition
2012. High praise indeed. I want another glass tonight, but it’s Thursday… sadly
not a drinking night. Ah, but tomorrow…
Interesting, perhaps some air exposure is needed before a whisky is at its best. I've always worried about oxidation imparting 'staleness' to an open whisky, even though I can't say I've ever detected any off notes after several months.
ReplyDeleteThinking about it the barrels can't be fully airtight, so surely the whisky is already fully oxidised after spending 8+ years sitting in one? Could be I'm worrying over nothing.
I know that some people advocate leaving 10-15 minutes between pouring and drinking a glass of whisky in order to let it 'open up' but not having tried this I don't know whether it makes any difference; maybe something similar happens in the bottle when enough air has been let in? Congratulations you've piqued my curiosity!
Thanks David. Yes, I have often wondered about those things. It has certainly been my experience that whisky tends to improve for several months after opening - sometimes up to 6 or 7 months, though I can't comment beyond that as I've never had a bottle last longer than 7 months. Everything I read previously made me think I should be concerned about the effects of oxidisation, but my current thinking is more that it should be embraced.
ReplyDeleteI do tend to leave a glass after pouring for a duration of 1 minute per year of ageing and, like you, can't really say for sure whether it has any effect. At the very least, it ramps up the anticipation and makes that first sip even more enjoyable - if only psychologically.
What you say about the barrels is interesting too. Some distillers will say the air will affect the quality of their product, for example imparting a salty flavour when aged somewhere by the sea. It seems no one knows for sure whether this is true - Islay malt Caol Ila is famously aged on the mainland, yet still has a distinct Islay profile. However, if the air can have such an effect, then surely the whisky is being oxidised as it ages...
Whatever it is, it's an interesting thing to think about.
Thanks for visiting, and enjoy yer whisky!