Nikka Pure Malt is a
Japanese blended malt that comes in black, white and red label varieties, all
of which are bottled at 43%. The black is mainly composed of malt from the
Yoichi distillery, the red from the Miyagikyo distillery and this one, the
white, from Islay malt… which seems a bit weird. Really? Does this mean it isn’t Japanese at all? Does it mean they
get whisky from Islay, ship it to Japan, blend it and then sell it back to us?
It is confusing because the website says it is “a pure malt whisky made mainly
with Islay, Scotland type malt”. That
could mean the malted barley is like
that used in Islay, or that the whisky is in the Islay style, or even that they’ve bought a load of Islay malts and
blended them. I’ve asked them, and they haven’t replied. However, numerous
other blogs mention that whisky from the Yoichi distillery is blended with
whisky from Islay. I don’t know where they all got this from, but enough of
them say it to suggest it must be true.
At this point (on
the various other blogs) discussion moves over to which Islay distillery provides the scotch portion, which the
general consensus being Caol Ila since other distilleries are either allied
with the Suntory distillery or don’t produce malt of this character. Further
“proof” is supplied by detecting a taste of soap both in this bottling and in
Caol Ila… though not to my mind. It does make sense on flavour profile that
Caol Ila might be the mystery ingredient, but I don’t taste soap in either.
Ruminations also become obsolete if you consider that blending whisky is
supposed to create all manner of results – including revealing characteristics
that weren’t originally present in any of the constituent parts. So, as ever,
it can’t really be said to mean anything.
It is interesting
that my friend Phil bought me this as a birthday present, and I had also
coincidentally bought him a vatted malt for his. I got the better deal though,
as his was a Cutty Sark. We tried both and first impressions were that the
Nikka is better, though I don’t have any extensive comparison notes for you –
he took his Cutty Sark home, and I enjoyed the Nikka over the next couple of
months in peace.
Presentation
Inside a plain but
intriguing brown cardboard box you get a unique bottle with a wide but stubby
neck that is almost like a jar and similarly proportioned cork.
Value
You can expect to
pay between £35 and £45, which I consider to be decent value, though you have
to remember you’re only getting 50cl, so ultimately you’re going to be asking
yourself whether you could pick up 70cl of one of your favourite Islay malts
for a similar price and whether you’d prefer that.
The Pudding
Fruity with a rich saltiness
on entry, this gives way to leather notes and a pleasant earthiness, before
finishing a little too dry and slightly bitter.
Conclusions
Nikka White Label
certainly has a lot to offer in terms of complexity. It’s very enjoyable,
though sadly the half litre bottle restricts the opportunity to appreciate it fully.
Still, this is a
very impressive spirit, which ranks right up with the best I’ve sampled this
year so far – single malt or otherwise. The price and volume are a little
prohibitive ( I can indeed get 70cl of a number of my favourite Islay malts for
a similar price), but it’s definitely worth a punt, and if you’re looking for a
gift to impress a whisky drinker, you won’t be far off the mark with this one.
It’s been nice
chatting to you once again. Come back next week for some more booze related
things.
Good Post, very informative, thanks for sharing with us. Keep sharing.
ReplyDeleteBuy Nikka 34 Year Old 1964