Happy Friday,
everyone. I’m afraid this week’s post is
going to be something of an unfocused affair. Why? Because things are happening.
And because I’ve been very busy this week, so I haven’t had time to work on all
the posts I would have liked to have been able to consider for publication.
So, what is it
that’s happening? Well, for one thing, the 2012 European Championships start tonight,
so that’s very exciting, even though anticipation here in England has been
particularly muted. It’s almost like we’re not expecting to win, or something.
I had a massive post
planned for the Euros, but it was long, rambling and frankly, nothing that
hasn’t been said before, so all you need to know is that it’s happening and
I’ll be watching as much as possible. Brenda, you’ve lost me for three weeks. Oh
– and I’ve drawn Greece in the work sweepstake, so that’s £2 I won’t be seeing
again.
What else? It’s the
weekend of Brenda’s hen-do, so I’ve been asked to vacate the premises for the
weekend and allow all manner of girly things to take place – pillow fights in
lingerie, probably. It means we can take a break from the DIY, and I can pop
over to Sheffield to visit Phil for some drinking, maybe some golf and – more
importantly from the perspective of this blog – boozy chess.
Yes, I’ve been
planning it for a while, but it’s surprising how few people actually play
chess, so this weekend will be my first opportunity to try it out.
I’m not immensely
experienced at drinking games (just the drinking part), but it seems to me that
they are based around the idea that games are fun, alcohol is fun and games are
more fun when mental and physical
capabilities are impaired by consumption of alcohol. It’s like fun to the power
of fun.
Chess though, is a tough game, and I’m expecting it’s even
more so when your brain wants to go to sleep under alcohol sedation. I’m not
sure how this is going to work as yet – do you drink for the pieces you take,
or when your pieces are taken? Well, I guess that will be up to me.
I think the ramifications for possible tactics are quite
interesting. If your opponent is a more skilled player than you, and the rule
is that your opponent drinks when you take their pieces, a good tactic
might be to quickly take as many of their pieces as possible, and rely on the
alcohol impairing their ability to coordinate attacks while effectively
defending their king… but I guess you’d still need the basic ability to protect
your own pieces… and build attacks. Such a kamikaze approach could just as
easily backfire, since taking pieces willy-nilly invariably leads to losing
your own pieces.
An interesting variation would be that you have to
drink when you take a piece, such that taking a piece is both an advantage and
a disadvantage.
I would expect that achieving a definitive outcome among two
moderately skilled players who are taking the game seriously, quickly becomes
impossible since chess is all about forward planning and coordinating
attacks while ensuring your king is safe. It requires intense concentration, and because of that, I don’t expect we’ll
play more than the one game. So for this first time, the rule will be drink
when you lose a piece.
With most drinking games, you know roughly what is going to
happen before you start – you just don’t know how much fun it’s going to be. With
a game as fiercely tactical as chess though, I can’t really imagine what twists
and nuances might result. It seems to me like the sort of drinking game that
would benefit from repeated playing, since you could base your tactics on
experience of how the alcohol affects the game. So this will hopefully be the
first of many. My original idea was to have a four player knockout tournament –
two semi finals followed immediately by a final, all played in one evening so
how well you win your semi-final has a direct effect on your performance in the
final. I’m still recruiting for that.
The chess game in this picture looks particularly impressive
- all those different glasses representing the different pieces. In that
scenario you have one side drinking white liquids, and the other drinking
dark liquids. It does have a drawback though; in most chess games you have a
number of pieces left at the end (unless you’re both completely crap at
chess and end up with two pieces chasing each other round the board…), so
you’re going to be left with some drinks that have been poured, but not drunk.
Potentially the game could be over with very few pieces removed – I had a
non-alcoholic game with Brenda recently, and I only lost 5 pieces in total, so
that would have left me with 11 untouched drinks. And how are you supposed to remember which glass represents which piece when you're halfway through the game, you've had a few drinks and the pieces are all moved from their squares?
To deal with the practicalities and guard against wasted
booze, I’ll be using ordinary chess pieces, though I haven’t decided yet
whether to have different drinks relating to different pieces. Pawns could be a
shot of vermouth, more valuable pieces could be a shot of rum, and the queen
could be a double, I suppose. I think this time I’ll just stick with one drink,
but maybe next time… you never know. Using ordinary chess pieces won’t look as
cool, but you don’t need 16 identical glasses for your pawns and then 3
different sets of four and one set of two, all that fit onto a chess board –
you don’t need a glass for the king, since that piece is never taken.
My plan is to get the boozy chess out of the way fairly
early in the evening, so that we can ride the booze buzz into town for a few
hours. Money is tight this month, but I think I’ve budgeted effectively enough
for that… until one of those unexpected expenses pops up.
Next week I’ll be back with a new booze related post, and
I’ll try to provide an update on how the chess turned out – if it’s interesting
enough to talk about. I’ll leave you with a link to a variation on booze chess,
in case you want to try that. It sounds pretty hardcore, so if you do, let me
know how you make out.
While you're away, I've been on taxi duty for Brenda's he do! As for the Euros, I heard that apart from 96 where we had the home advantage, we've only won 4 games in the finals!?!? And before we've always been quite optimistic - this time we're not. Oh, and I thought we'd established booze and chess don't mix?
ReplyDeleteThanks Paul. I don't think we had established anything about booze and chess, given that the time we played it in that pub, we were already 3 or 4 hours into a hardcore pub crawl.
ReplyDeleteA full account of boozy chess, btw, is now published.