As part of last
year’s Christmas festivities, Mrs Cake decided to elevate her festive
enthusiasm to new heights by creating an advent calendar for me. It wasn’t two
bits of card with flaps concealing uninspiring chocolate in the shape of
generic yuletide objects though, it was five carrier bags of presents that
represented a treat a day – small things mostly; there were at least three Mars
bars and Dairy Milks on separate days, but there was also a pack of cookies, a
bag of Opal Fruits, chocolate money, Twiglets, Brannigans crisps, and… five
individually wrapped beers.
Don’t get too
excited, they were all from Aldi, and some bore the legend, “bottled
exclusively for Aldi”, but cast your snobbery aside. They were all nice, and
Mrs Cake tells me, only £1 each (with one exception). These were of the premium
beer variety, so in Tesco you’d be paying at least double for something similar
to these.
The most interesting
of the beers though, was this one; Bateman’s Premium Vintage Ale. This one was
so special that it came in its own box – which led to some confusion at first,
since I accidentally found it in the ‘calendar’ too early. “No!” cried
Mrs Cake.
“That’ll be a pretty
special beer if it comes in a box!” I exclaimed, while actually thinking
it must be a small bottle of whisky. I didn’t want her to know I knew, and
secretly made sure it was the right way up so that the cork wouldn’t damage the
bottle’s contents.
So when 24 December
came and it was finally time to open it, it turned out that it had been a beer
in a box all along. I wasn’t disappointed though, as Mrs Cake had already put
her proper presents under the tree, and one was definitely a bottle of
whisky.
Also, I don’t think
I’d seen a beer in a box before, and this one said, “limited release – Vintage
Ale”. In fact, it was even numbered (out of 5000), though I didn’t make a note
of what number it was – it was too high to be of any interest to me.
Vintage ale – I don’t think I’d heard that term before.
It suggests it’s old, a supposition that was to some extent reinforced by the
information on the box, which included a rather charming story about some cases
of barley wine (strong beer) being forgotten about for thirty odd years, then
discovered and found to be delicious.
Exciting stuff until
you read on and discover that the bottle you’re holding isn’t one of those. It
is inspired by the discovery of those cases. There’s no information on
Bateman’s website, and the information on the box was incomplete, but this blog fills in the gaps. It seems the brewers attempted to recreate the old
brew, and aged it in oak casks for a comparatively brief seven months. It all
ends with your favourite grocery store and mine, Aldi, being pleased to
distribute them. They still had some in stock at £3.29 a bottle for some time
after Christmas, but sadly I’ve been too slow getting this post out, and by now
I’m fairly sure they’re all gone.
The word ‘vintage’,
I have since found out, doesn’t necessarily mean ‘old’. The term actually
relates to the year in question, so you could easily have a 2013 vintage
– that would be a beer made using malt and hops from this year of our lord
2013.
Stuart Bateman, the
MD of Batemans reckons this is the best beer he’s ever tasted but, you know, he
probably would. What do I think of it? Well, I’m no expert on beer, though I
have been known to dabble with them from time to time, and er… well, I’ll tell
you in a minute.
My friend Paul is a
bit more enthusiastic about real ale than I am, so I thought he might
appreciate the chance to partake in the tasting. I took it along therefore, to
his house and we poured it into two glasses.
It’s a satisfyingly
strong 7.5% ABV, so it gets points for that straight away, but what can I say
other than it tasted like a strong British ale? Sure, it was nice, but the best
beer I’ve ever tasted? No. I don’t remember it being that good. Yeah, I’d
already had a few drinks, and was no doubt slightly distracted, chatting with
Paul and Victoria and the wife, but if it was the best beer I’d ever tasted, I
would still have noticed. I don’t think Paul was particularly taken aback
either, but I’ve quizzed him since and while he doesn’t remember much
specifically, he’s was quite positive about it.
I was a little
perturbed by the incomplete nature of the information on the packaging, which
made me sceptical as to the overall quality. Alcohol brands are full of
impressive sounding boasts that on closer inspection are hard to validate, or
not that impressive after all, so you’ll have to excuse me for being a little
cynical.
It was still
interesting to try though, and I couldn’t say at the time whether I’d tried any
‘aged’ ales before, though I’ve since learned that cask ales can often be aged
for from as little as a few months to around a year, helping them to develop
fully. There is still yeast in the cask or bottle with real ale, and this
enables the brew to undergo a further fermentation process, so in theory the
ale can get better and better, as long as you don’t open it and begin the
dreaded oxidisation process.
I have had a fair
amount of real ale in the past, though I don’t remember ever learning how long
any particular beer had been maturing – I’m sure many will have been a good few
months old nevertheless.
As someone who finds
aged liquor fascinating (just the thought of it sitting there in barrels for
years – or months in this case – is interesting to me), I was intrigued by what
this bottle would reveal. In conclusion though, it tasted like many other ales
I’ve tried previously, so perhaps the only question is why hadn’t I heard of
vintage ale before? As I say, I’ve drunk a lot of beer over the years and been
to a fair few real ale festivals – I shouldn’t have to actively research this
stuff in order to find out about it.
Don’t get me wrong
here, it was a nice beer. It’s just that my excitement at the prospect of
something I thought was quite unique faded when I realised firstly that the
story on the box was only part of the story, and secondly that this
would not be the first time I had ever experienced ‘vintage’ ale. Seems it’s
just about how it is packaged and presented.
This blog sure is
turning out to be educational (for me). I expect a good number of people who
happen across it already know a lot of this stuff anyway, but thanks for
stopping by! I hope you will do so again. Next week I’m planning to reveal the
results of a tasting of five whiskies that I did recently - it is subject to change
depending on how I feel about it at the time, but come by anyway. I’ll try to
make it interesting.
I’ll be indulging in
more drink-related activities this weekend as usual. I’m looking forward to
this evening in particular because I plan to polish off my bottle of Bladnoch
10 year old, and I’ve told myself that once that’s gone I’ll allow myself to
open a new bottle. I’ve decided to make it a blend because I have a bit of the
Dewars 12 year old double aged left in my hip flask, and I’ll be able to do a comparative
study. That should probably be “study”. The blend in question is one that I
picked up on my recent distilgrimage to Islay, but I won’t mention it
now because I want to save the details for my travelogue (“travelogue”) that
should be coming up in a few weeks. Opening a new bottle is one of my favourite
things. I am such a geek.
You make sure you
have a good weekend now, ok? See you soon.
No comments:
Post a Comment